23 releases (8 breaking)
0.8.2 | Dec 3, 2024 |
---|---|
0.8.0 | Nov 26, 2024 |
0.5.0 | Jun 24, 2024 |
0.1.1 | Mar 25, 2024 |
0.0.5 | Nov 27, 2023 |
#118 in Parser implementations
60,784 downloads per month
Used in 3 crates
(via datafusion-functions-json)
160KB
3.5K
SLoC
jiter
Fast iterable JSON parser.
Documentation is available at docs.rs/jiter.
jiter has three interfaces:
JsonValue
an enum representing JSON dataJiter
an iterator over JSON dataPythonParse
which parses a JSON string into a Python object
JsonValue Example
See the JsonValue
docs for more details.
use jiter::JsonValue;
let json_data = r#"
{
"name": "John Doe",
"age": 43,
"phones": [
"+44 1234567",
"+44 2345678"
]
}"#;
let json_value = JsonValue::parse(json_data.as_bytes(), true).unwrap();
println!("{:#?}", json_value);
returns:
Object(
{
"name": Str("John Doe"),
"age": Int(43),
"phones": Array(
[
Str("+44 1234567"),
Str("+44 2345678"),
],
),
},
)
Jiter Example
To use Jiter, you need to know what schema you're expecting:
use jiter::{Jiter, NumberInt, Peek};
let json_data = r#"
{
"name": "John Doe",
"age": 43,
"phones": [
"+44 1234567",
"+44 2345678"
]
}"#;
let mut jiter = Jiter::new(json_data.as_bytes());
assert_eq!(jiter.next_object().unwrap(), Some("name"));
assert_eq!(jiter.next_str().unwrap(), "John Doe");
assert_eq!(jiter.next_key().unwrap(), Some("age"));
assert_eq!(jiter.next_int().unwrap(), NumberInt::Int(43));
assert_eq!(jiter.next_key().unwrap(), Some("phones"));
assert_eq!(jiter.next_array().unwrap(), Some(Peek::String));
// we know the next value is a string as we just asserted so
assert_eq!(jiter.known_str().unwrap(), "+44 1234567");
assert_eq!(jiter.array_step().unwrap(), Some(Peek::String));
// same again
assert_eq!(jiter.known_str().unwrap(), "+44 2345678");
// next we'll get `None` from `array_step` as the array is finished
assert_eq!(jiter.array_step().unwrap(), None);
// and `None` from `next_key` as the object is finished
assert_eq!(jiter.next_key().unwrap(), None);
// and we check there's nothing else in the input
jiter.finish().unwrap();
Benchmarks
There are lies, damned lies and benchmarks.
In particular, serde-json benchmarks use serde_json::Value
which is significantly slower than deserializing
to a string.
For more details, see the benchmarks.
running 48 tests
test big_jiter_iter ... bench: 3,662,616 ns/iter (+/- 88,878)
test big_jiter_value ... bench: 6,998,605 ns/iter (+/- 292,383)
test big_serde_value ... bench: 29,793,191 ns/iter (+/- 576,173)
test bigints_array_jiter_iter ... bench: 11,836 ns/iter (+/- 414)
test bigints_array_jiter_value ... bench: 28,979 ns/iter (+/- 938)
test bigints_array_serde_value ... bench: 129,797 ns/iter (+/- 5,096)
test floats_array_jiter_iter ... bench: 19,302 ns/iter (+/- 631)
test floats_array_jiter_value ... bench: 31,083 ns/iter (+/- 921)
test floats_array_serde_value ... bench: 208,932 ns/iter (+/- 6,167)
test lazy_map_lookup_1_10 ... bench: 615 ns/iter (+/- 15)
test lazy_map_lookup_2_20 ... bench: 1,776 ns/iter (+/- 36)
test lazy_map_lookup_3_50 ... bench: 4,291 ns/iter (+/- 77)
test massive_ints_array_jiter_iter ... bench: 62,244 ns/iter (+/- 1,616)
test massive_ints_array_jiter_value ... bench: 82,889 ns/iter (+/- 1,916)
test massive_ints_array_serde_value ... bench: 498,650 ns/iter (+/- 47,759)
test medium_response_jiter_iter ... bench: 0 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test medium_response_jiter_value ... bench: 3,521 ns/iter (+/- 101)
test medium_response_jiter_value_owned ... bench: 6,088 ns/iter (+/- 180)
test medium_response_serde_value ... bench: 9,383 ns/iter (+/- 342)
test pass1_jiter_iter ... bench: 0 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test pass1_jiter_value ... bench: 3,048 ns/iter (+/- 79)
test pass1_serde_value ... bench: 6,588 ns/iter (+/- 232)
test pass2_jiter_iter ... bench: 384 ns/iter (+/- 9)
test pass2_jiter_value ... bench: 1,259 ns/iter (+/- 44)
test pass2_serde_value ... bench: 1,237 ns/iter (+/- 38)
test sentence_jiter_iter ... bench: 283 ns/iter (+/- 10)
test sentence_jiter_value ... bench: 357 ns/iter (+/- 15)
test sentence_serde_value ... bench: 428 ns/iter (+/- 9)
test short_numbers_jiter_iter ... bench: 0 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test short_numbers_jiter_value ... bench: 18,085 ns/iter (+/- 613)
test short_numbers_serde_value ... bench: 87,253 ns/iter (+/- 1,506)
test string_array_jiter_iter ... bench: 615 ns/iter (+/- 18)
test string_array_jiter_value ... bench: 1,410 ns/iter (+/- 44)
test string_array_jiter_value_owned ... bench: 2,863 ns/iter (+/- 151)
test string_array_serde_value ... bench: 3,467 ns/iter (+/- 60)
test true_array_jiter_iter ... bench: 299 ns/iter (+/- 8)
test true_array_jiter_value ... bench: 995 ns/iter (+/- 29)
test true_array_serde_value ... bench: 1,207 ns/iter (+/- 36)
test true_object_jiter_iter ... bench: 2,482 ns/iter (+/- 84)
test true_object_jiter_value ... bench: 2,058 ns/iter (+/- 45)
test true_object_serde_value ... bench: 7,991 ns/iter (+/- 370)
test unicode_jiter_iter ... bench: 315 ns/iter (+/- 7)
test unicode_jiter_value ... bench: 389 ns/iter (+/- 6)
test unicode_serde_value ... bench: 445 ns/iter (+/- 6)
test x100_jiter_iter ... bench: 12 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test x100_jiter_value ... bench: 20 ns/iter (+/- 1)
test x100_serde_iter ... bench: 72 ns/iter (+/- 3)
test x100_serde_value ... bench: 83 ns/iter (+/- 3)
Dependencies
~4MB
~82K SLoC