2 releases
0.1.1 | Jan 3, 2024 |
---|---|
0.1.0 | Jan 3, 2024 |
#1297 in Math
42KB
922 lines
astro_float
for nalgebra
This package implements the traits required to use the linear algebra library nalgebra on the type BigFloat
in astro_float. This library exports it's own type BigFloat<CTX>
where CTX
is a computational context that stores precision and rounding mode.
Examples
Compile-time const precision
Using this library with a precision and rounding mode that is known at compile-time is straight forward using the ConstCtx
computational context. It is recommended to store BigFloat<ConstCtx<P,RM>>
in a type alias so the code is more readable.
use astro_nalgebra::{BigFloat, ConstCtx, RoundingMode};
use nalgebra::Vector2;
// This defines a type that has a precision upper bound of
// 1024 bits in the mantissa and no explicit rounding mode
type BF1024 = BigFloat<ConstCtx<1024>>;
// See the documentation on ConstCtx for how to specify a rounding mode
fn main() {
let two: BF1024 = "2".parse().unwrap();
let six: BF1024 = "6".parse().unwrap();
let vec: Vector2<BF1024> = Vector2::new(two,six);
let seven: BF1024 = "7".parse().unwrap();
// Prints [2/7, 6/7] as decimals until 1024 bits
println!("{}", vec / seven);
}
While it is completely allowed to name the type something like f1024
, it does technically break the floating point naming scheme because the type BigFloat<ConstCtx<64>>
has 64 bits in the mantissa, while types like f64
only have 52 bits in the mantissa with 12 bits reserved for sign and exponent. So f64
and BigFloat<ConstCtx<64>>
are not the same.
Run-time dynamic precision
Dynamic precision is more tricky to implement because some methods outlined in nalgebra::RealField
do not have any arguments, so the precision has to be stored in the type. However run-time determined variables cannot be stored in a const generic, so there has to be a dummy type with the methods get_prec
and get_rm
. There is a macro to quickly define this dummy type which references a global, thread-safe OnceLock
that has to be set at runtime.
Example:
use astro_nalgebra::{BigFloat, make_dyn_ctx, RoundingMode};
// This macro takes in the name of a dynamic context (the new type to be made)
// And the name of a global OnceLock to store the precision and rounding mode.
// The name of this global variable is not important, it just has to be unique
// within the scope of the macro call.
make_dyn_ctx!(DynCtx, DYN_CTX_CELL);
type DynFloat = BigFloat<DynCtx>;
fn main() {
let precision = 88;
let rounding_mode = RoundingMode::None;
// Sets the precision and rounding mode of the DynCtx context.
// This method can only be called once or it will panic.
DynCtx::set(precision, rounding_mode);
let num: DynFloat = "120".parse().unwrap();
}
Why they have to be implemented with generics
There are two possible ways this library could have been implemented:
- A very simple wrapper around
astro_float::BigFloat
that stored precision in the struct itself. - A wrapper that stores precision as a generic in the type.
The only way to guarantee proper accuracy is to use the latter technique. Here is an example of where the former technique would break:
use nalgebra::RealField;
fn mul_by_pi<T: RealField>(val: T) -> T {
val * T::pi()
}
If the desired precision of the calculation was stored in val, then the call to BigFloat::pi()
would not be able to access the precision because RealField::pi()
does not take any arguments. Therefore, the desired precision has to be stored in the type itself.
Dependencies
~6MB
~125K SLoC