1.17.0 — diff review from 1.16.0 only (current)
From zcash/rust-ecosystem copy of zcash/zcash. Audited without comment by str4d.
These reviews are from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet
and submit your URL to its registry.
1.17.0 — diff review from 1.16.0 only (current)
From zcash/rust-ecosystem copy of zcash/zcash. Audited without comment by str4d.
1.17.0 (current)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of salsa.debian.org.
The current version of Typenum is 1.17.0.
1.16.0 — diff review from 1.15.0 only (older version)
From mozilla/supply-chain copy of hg. Audited without comment by Mike Hommey.
1.16.0 (older version)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of git.savannah.gnu.org.
Packaged for Guix (crates-io)
cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.
This crate will not introduce a serious security vulnerability to production software exposed to untrusted input. More…
This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…
May have been packaged automatically without a review
These reviews are from Crev, a distributed system for code reviews. To add your review, set up cargo-crev
.
The current version of Typenum is 1.17.0.
1.11.2 (older version) Thoroughness: Low Understanding: Low
by gitlab.com/chrysn on 2020-04-02
Focus points of the review were the custom build script (which looks perfectly reasonable), and the unsafe parts (which are to get instances of the anyway-ZST types, and are in the process of being removed).
1.10.0 (older version) Thoroughness: Low Understanding: Low
by kornelski on 2019-07-25
Lib.rs has been able to verify that all files in the crate's tarball are in the crate's repository with a git tag matching the version. Please note that this check is still in beta, and absence of this confirmation does not mean that the files don't match.
Crates in the crates.io registry are tarball snapshots uploaded by crates' publishers. The registry is not using crates' git repositories, so there is a possibility that published crates have a misleading repository URL, or contain different code from the code in the repository.
To review the actual code of the crate, it's best to use cargo crev open typenum
. Alternatively, you can download the tarball of typenum v1.17.0 or view the source online.
Only in debcargo (unstable). Changelog: