0.1.32 — diff review from 0.1.30 only (current)
From google/supply-chain copy of google/rust-crate-audits. By Manish Goregaokar.
These reviews are from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet
and submit your URL to its registry.
0.1.32 — diff review from 0.1.30 only (current)
From google/supply-chain copy of google/rust-crate-audits. By Manish Goregaokar.
0.1.32 — diff review from 0.1.31 only (current)
From zcash/rust-ecosystem copy of zcash/zcash. Audited without comment by str4d.
0.1.32 (current)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of salsa.debian.org.
Only in debcargo (unstable). Changelog:
0.1.32 (current)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of git.savannah.gnu.org.
Packaged for Guix (crates-io)
The current version of tracing-core is 0.1.32.
0.1.31 — diff review from 0.1.21 only (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of fuchsia. By David Koloski.
Reviewed on https://fxrev.dev/906816
0.1.31 — diff review from 0.1.28 only (older version)
From bytecodealliance/wasmtime. By Alex Crichton.
This is a relatively minor set of releases with minor refactorings and bug fixes. Nothing fundamental was added in these changes.
0.1.30 (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of google/rust-crate-audits. By Benjamin Saunders.
Reviewed in CL 555490997
0.1.30 (older version)
From mozilla/supply-chain copy of hg. By Alex Franchuk.
Most unsafe code is in implementing non-std sync primitives. Unsafe impls are logically correct and justified in comments, and unsafe code is sound and justified in comments.
0.1.30 — diff review from 0.1.29 only (older version)
From mozilla/supply-chain copy of hg. Audited without comment by Mike Hommey.
0.1.29 (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. Audited without comment by ChromeOS.
cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.
This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…
This crate will not introduce a serious security vulnerability to production software exposed to untrusted input. More…
Negligible unsoundness or average soundness.
Full description of the audit criteria can be found at https://github.com/google/rust-crate-audits/blob/main/auditing_standards.md#ub-risk-2
Mild unsoundness or suboptimal soundness.
Full description of the audit criteria can be found at https://github.com/google/rust-crate-audits/blob/main/auditing_standards.md#ub-risk-3
Extreme unsoundness.
Full description of the audit criteria can be found at https://github.com/google/rust-crate-audits/blob/main/auditing_standards.md#ub-risk-4
Inspection reveals that the crate in question does not attempt to implement any cryptographic algorithms on its own.
Note that certification of this does not require an expert on all forms of cryptography: it's expected for crates we import to be "good enough" citizens, so they'll at least be forthcoming if they try to implement something cryptographic. When in doubt, please ask an expert.
All crypto algorithms in this crate have been reviewed by a relevant expert.
Note: If a crate does not implement crypto, use does-not-implement-crypto
,
which implies crypto-safe
, but does not require expert review in order to
audit for.
May have been packaged automatically without a review
Lib.rs has been able to verify that all files in the crate's tarball are in the crate's repository with a git tag matching the version. Please note that this check is still in beta, and absence of this confirmation does not mean that the files don't match.
Crates in the crates.io registry are tarball snapshots uploaded by crates' publishers. The registry is not using crates' git repositories, so there is a possibility that published crates have a misleading repository URL, or contain different code from the code in the repository.
To review the actual code of the crate, it's best to use cargo crev open tracing-core
. Alternatively, you can download the tarball of tracing-core v0.1.32 or view the source online.
Reviewed in CL 573852436