0.3.1 (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. Audited without comment by Android Legacy.
These reviews are from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet
and submit your URL to its registry.
The current version of rand_chacha is 0.9.0-alpha.2.
0.3.1 (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. Audited without comment by Android Legacy.
0.3.1 (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. By Allen Webb.
0.3.1 (older version)
From divviup/libprio-rs. Audited without comment by David Cook.
0.3.1 (older version)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of git.savannah.gnu.org.
Packaged for Guix (crates-io)
cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.
This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…
All crypto algorithms in this crate have been reviewed by a relevant expert.
Note: If a crate does not implement crypto, use does-not-implement-crypto
,
which implies crypto-safe
, but does not require expert review in order to
audit for.
This crate will not introduce a serious security vulnerability to production software exposed to untrusted input. More…
May have been packaged automatically without a review
This review is from Crev, a distributed system for code reviews. To add your review, set up cargo-crev
.
The current version of rand_chacha is 0.9.0-alpha.2.
0.3.0 (older version) Thoroughness: Medium Understanding: Medium
by mgeisler on 2021-05-07
Standard and well-tested RNG. Has one instance of unsafe, which seems safe to me.
Lib.rs has been able to verify that all files in the crate's tarball are in the crate's repository with a git tag matching the version. Please note that this check is still in beta, and absence of this confirmation does not mean that the files don't match.
Crates in the crates.io registry are tarball snapshots uploaded by crates' publishers. The registry is not using crates' git repositories, so there is a possibility that published crates have a misleading repository URL, or contain different code from the code in the repository.
To review the actual code of the crate, it's best to use cargo crev open rand_chacha
. Alternatively, you can download the tarball of rand_chacha v0.9.0-alpha.2 or view the source online.
This crate doesn't actually implement ChaCha, it uses the implementation in
c2-chacha
. Note that this review has been internally tracked in b/330501364.