0.8.5 (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. By Dana Jansens.
These reviews are from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet
and submit your URL to its registry.
The current version of Rand is 0.9.0-beta.1.
0.8.5 (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. By Dana Jansens.
0.8.5 (older version)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of salsa.debian.org.
Packaged for Debian (stable). Changelog:
0.8.5 (older version)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of git.savannah.gnu.org.
Packaged for Guix (crates-io)
0.8.3 (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. Audited without comment by Android Legacy.
cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.
This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…
Inspection reveals that the crate in question does not attempt to implement any cryptographic algorithms on its own.
Note that certification of this does not require an expert on all forms of cryptography: it's expected for crates we import to be "good enough" citizens, so they'll at least be forthcoming if they try to implement something cryptographic. When in doubt, please ask an expert.
All crypto algorithms in this crate have been reviewed by a relevant expert.
Note: If a crate does not implement crypto, use does-not-implement-crypto
,
which implies crypto-safe
, but does not require expert review in order to
audit for.
May have been packaged automatically without a review
These reviews are from Crev, a distributed system for code reviews. To add your review, set up cargo-crev
.
The current version of Rand is 0.9.0-beta.1.
0.8.3 (older version) Thoroughness: Low Understanding: Low
by mgeisler on 2021-05-07
This is the standard crate for random number generation. I use it in my own projects.
The code uses unsafe in a few places for performance reasons such as SIMD support. It is hard for me to say if this is safe, but I have had no problems with it myself.
0.8.1 (older version) Thoroughness: Low Understanding: Low
by mgeisler on 2021-05-07
This is the standard crate for random number generation. I use it in my own projects.
The code uses unsafe in a few places for performance reasons such as SIMD support. It is hard for me to say if this is safe, but I have had no problems with it myself.
0.7.0 (older version) Thoroughness: None Understanding: None
by dpc on 2019-09-05
0.6.5 (older version) Thoroughness: Low Understanding: Medium
Approved without comment by gitlab.com/KonradBorowski on 2019-07-31
0.6.1 (older version) Thoroughness: None Understanding: Low
by dpc on 2018-12-20
I failed to review the whole thing. I looked at unsafe
s and when through ~10 random files. LGTM, but considering how important this crate it, my understanding of it is insufficient.
Lib.rs has been able to verify that all files in the crate's tarball, except Cargo.lock
,
are in the crate's repository. Please note that this check is still in beta, and absence of this confirmation does not mean that the files don't match.
Crates in the crates.io registry are tarball snapshots uploaded by crates' publishers. The registry is not using crates' git repositories, so there is a possibility that published crates have a misleading repository URL, or contain different code from the code in the repository.
To review the actual code of the crate, it's best to use cargo crev open rand
. Alternatively, you can download the tarball of rand v0.9.0-beta.1 or view the source online.
Reviewed in https://crrev.com/c/5171063
Previously reviewed during security review and the audit is grandparented in.