0.13.3 — diff review from 0.12.6 only (current)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. Audited without comment by Lukasz Anforowicz.
These reviews are from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet
and submit your URL to its registry.
0.13.3 — diff review from 0.12.6 only (current)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. Audited without comment by Lukasz Anforowicz.
The current version of prost-derive is 0.13.3.
0.12.6 — diff review from 0.12.5 only (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. By Dustin J. Mitchell.
0.12.6 — diff review from 0.12.3 only (older version)
From zcash/rust-ecosystem copy of zcash/librustzcash. By str4d.
Changes to proc macro code are to fix lints after bumping MSRV.
0.12.6 (older version)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of salsa.debian.org.
Only in debcargo (unstable). Changelog:
0.12.5 — diff review from 0.12.3 only (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. Audited without comment by Dana Jansens.
0.12.3 (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. Audited without comment by agl.
0.12.3 — diff review from 0.12.1 only (older version)
From zcash/rust-ecosystem copy of zcash/librustzcash. Audited without comment by Daira Emma Hopwood.
0.12.3 (older version)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of git.savannah.gnu.org.
Packaged for Guix (crates-io)
0.12.1 — diff review from 0.11.9 only (older version)
From mozilla/supply-chain copy of hg. Audited without comment by Drew Willcoxon.
0.11.9 — diff review from 0.8.0 only (older version)
From mozilla/supply-chain copy of hg. By Jan-Erik Rediger.
Documentation and internal refactoring changes only
0.11.9 95964e — diff review from 0.11.9 only (older version)
From mozilla/supply-chain copy of hg. By Mike Hommey.
Changes against 0.11.9 are mine.
0.11.0 (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. Audited without comment by George Burgess IV.
0.11.0 (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. Audited without comment by ChromeOS.
cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.
Inspection reveals that the crate in question does not attempt to implement any cryptographic algorithms on its own.
Note that certification of this does not require an expert on all forms of cryptography: it's expected for crates we import to be "good enough" citizens, so they'll at least be forthcoming if they try to implement something cryptographic. When in doubt, please ask an expert.
All crypto algorithms in this crate have been reviewed by a relevant expert.
Note: If a crate does not implement crypto, use does-not-implement-crypto
,
which implies crypto-safe
, but does not require expert review in order to
audit for.
This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…
No unsafe code.
Full description of the audit criteria can be found at https://github.com/google/rust-crate-audits/blob/main/auditing_standards.md#ub-risk-0
Excellent soundness.
Full description of the audit criteria can be found at https://github.com/google/rust-crate-audits/blob/main/auditing_standards.md#ub-risk-1
Negligible unsoundness or average soundness.
Full description of the audit criteria can be found at https://github.com/google/rust-crate-audits/blob/main/auditing_standards.md#ub-risk-2
Mild unsoundness or suboptimal soundness.
Full description of the audit criteria can be found at https://github.com/google/rust-crate-audits/blob/main/auditing_standards.md#ub-risk-3
Extreme unsoundness.
Full description of the audit criteria can be found at https://github.com/google/rust-crate-audits/blob/main/auditing_standards.md#ub-risk-4
This crate will not introduce a serious security vulnerability to production software exposed to untrusted input. More…
May have been packaged automatically without a review
Lib.rs has been able to verify that all files in the crate's tarball are in the crate's repository with a git tag matching the version. Please note that this check is still in beta, and absence of this confirmation does not mean that the files don't match.
Crates in the crates.io registry are tarball snapshots uploaded by crates' publishers. The registry is not using crates' git repositories, so there is a possibility that published crates have a misleading repository URL, or contain different code from the code in the repository.
To review the actual code of the crate, it's best to use cargo crev open prost-derive
. Alternatively, you can download the tarball of prost-derive v0.13.3 or view the source online.
No changes here; presumably a bump of the
prost
crate.