0.5.0 (older version)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of salsa.debian.org.
These reviews are from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet and submit your URL to its registry.
The current version of PasswordHash is 0.6.0-rc.0.
0.5.0 (older version)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of git.savannah.gnu.org.
Packaged for Guix (crates-io)
0.4.2 — diff review from 0.3.2 only (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of fuchsia. Audited without comment by Joshua Liebow-Feeser.
cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.
- safe-to-deploy (implies safe-to-run)
-
This crate will not introduce a serious security vulnerability to production software exposed to untrusted input. More…
- safe-to-run
Implied by other criteria
This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…
- ub-risk-2 (implies ub-risk-3)
-
Negligible unsoundness or average soundness.
Full description of the audit criteria can be found at https://github.com/google/rust-crate-audits/blob/main/auditing_standards.md#ub-risk-2
- ub-risk-3 (implies ub-risk-4)
Implied by other criteria
Mild unsoundness or suboptimal soundness.
Full description of the audit criteria can be found at https://github.com/google/rust-crate-audits/blob/main/auditing_standards.md#ub-risk-3
- ub-risk-4
Implied by other criteria
Extreme unsoundness.
Full description of the audit criteria can be found at https://github.com/google/rust-crate-audits/blob/main/auditing_standards.md#ub-risk-4
- unknown
-
May have been packaged automatically without a review
Lib.rs has been able to verify that all files in the crate's tarball are in the crate's repository with a git tag matching the version. Please note that this check is still in beta, and absence of this confirmation does not mean that the files don't match.
Crates in the crates.io registry are tarball snapshots uploaded by crates' publishers. The registry is not using crates' git repositories, so there is a possibility that published crates have a misleading repository URL, or contain different code from the code in the repository.
To review the actual code of the crate, it's best to use cargo crev open password-hash. Alternatively, you can download the tarball of password-hash v0.6.0-rc.0 or view the source online.
Only in debcargo (unstable). Changelog:
[ Fabian Grünbichler ]