0.4.1 (current)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of git.savannah.gnu.org.
These reviews are from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet and submit your URL to its registry.
The current version of ntapi is 0.4.1.
0.4.0 — diff review from 0.3.7 only (older version)
From mozilla/supply-chain copy of hg. Audited without comment by Mike Hommey.
0.4.0 (older version)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of salsa.debian.org.
Packaged for Debian (stable). Changelog:
- Team upload.
- Package ntapi 0.4.0 from crates.io using debcargo 2.6.0
cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.
- safe-to-deploy (implies safe-to-run)
-
This crate will not introduce a serious security vulnerability to production software exposed to untrusted input. More…
- safe-to-run
-
This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…
- unknown
-
May have been packaged automatically without a review
This review is from Crev, a distributed system for code reviews. To add your review, set up cargo-crev.
The current version of ntapi is 0.4.1.
0.3.6 (older version) Thoroughness: Low Understanding: Low
by kornelski on 2021-10-29
The build script is benign. It does what it says on the tin. I haven't checked whether definitions match the ABI.
Crates in the crates.io registry are tarball snapshots uploaded by crates' publishers. The registry is not using crates' git repositories. There is absolutely no guarantee that the repository URL declared by the crate belongs to the crate, or that the code in the repository is the code inside the published tarball.
To review the actual code of the crate, it's best to use cargo crev open ntapi. Alternatively, you can download the tarball of ntapi v0.4.1 or view the source online.
Packaged for Guix (crates-io)