Lib.rs

› Mint › Reviews

These reviews are from Crev, a distributed system for code reviews. To add your review, set up cargo-crev.

0.5.9 (current) Rating: Positive Thoroughness: Medium Understanding: Medium

by kpreid on 2023-09-01

A very straightforward library. Some complaints one could have about it:

  • No type documentation. Some was contributed but the PR stalled.
  • Contains use of unsafe code, to provide &/&mut access to different interpretations of the same type (e.g. a quaternion as either {Vector3<T>, T} or as [T; 4]). I believe the unsafe code is correct, even in the presence of unusual choices of T.

The current version of Mint is 0.5.9.

0.5.1 (older version) Rating: Positive Thoroughness: Medium Understanding: Medium

by git.sr.ht/~icefox on 2019-08-23

Has some unsafe code in surprising places, for zero-copy casts. P. sure it's valid though.

These reviews are from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet and submit your URL to its registry.

The current version of Mint is 0.5.9.

cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.

safe-to-run

This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…

unknown

May have been packaged automatically without a review

Lib.rs has been able to verify that all files in the crate's tarball are in the crate's repository. Please note that this check is still in beta, and absence of this confirmation does not mean that the files don't match.

Crates in the crates.io registry are tarball snapshots uploaded by crates' publishers. The registry is not using crates' git repositories, so there is a possibility that published crates have a misleading repository URL, or contain different code from the code in the repository.

To review the actual code of the crate, it's best to use cargo crev open mint. Alternatively, you can download the tarball of mint v0.5.9 or view the source online.