0.2.11 — diff review from 0.2.8 only (older version)
From bytecodealliance/wasmtime. By Alex Crichton.
These reviews are from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet and submit your URL to its registry.
The current version of libm is 0.2.14.
0.2.11 (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. Audited without comment by Manish Goregaokar.
0.2.8 — diff review from 0.2.7 only (older version)
From zcash/rust-ecosystem copy of zcash/zcash. By Jack Grigg.
Forces some intermediate values to not have too much precision on the x87 FPU.
0.2.8 (older version)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of salsa.debian.org.
Only in debcargo (unstable). Changelog:
- Team upload.
- Package libm 0.2.8 from crates.io using debcargo 2.7.0
- Drop fix-rint-on-x87.patch, merged upstream.
0.2.8 (older version)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of git.savannah.gnu.org.
Packaged for Guix (crates-io)
0.2.6 (older version)
From mozilla/supply-chain copy of hg. By Makoto Kato.
This crate uses unsafe block, but this doesn't have network and file access. I audited code.
0.2.6 — diff review from 0.2.5 only (older version)
From zcash/rust-ecosystem copy of zcash/zcash. Audited without comment by Jack Grigg.
cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.
- safe-to-deploy (implies safe-to-run)
-
This crate will not introduce a serious security vulnerability to production software exposed to untrusted input. More…
- safe-to-run
Implied by other criteria
This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…
- does-not-implement-crypto (implies crypto-safe)
-
Inspection reveals that the crate in question does not attempt to implement any cryptographic algorithms on its own.
Note that certification of this does not require an expert on all forms of cryptography: it's expected for crates we import to be "good enough" citizens, so they'll at least be forthcoming if they try to implement something cryptographic. When in doubt, please ask an expert.
- crypto-safe
Implied by other criteria
All crypto algorithms in this crate have been reviewed by a relevant expert.
Note: If a crate does not implement crypto, use
does-not-implement-crypto, which impliescrypto-safe, but does not require expert review in order to audit for.- unknown
-
May have been packaged automatically without a review
Crates in the crates.io registry are tarball snapshots uploaded by crates' publishers. The registry is not using crates' git repositories. There is absolutely no guarantee that the repository URL declared by the crate belongs to the crate, or that the code in the repository is the code inside the published tarball.
To review the actual code of the crate, it's best to use cargo crev open libm. Alternatively, you can download the tarball of libm v0.2.14 or view the source online.
Mostly formatting-related changes, nothing major.