0.1.1 (current)
From divviup/libprio-rs. By Ameer Ghani.
This review is from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet
and submit your URL to its registry.
0.1.1 (current)
From divviup/libprio-rs. By Ameer Ghani.
cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.
This crate will not introduce a serious security vulnerability to production software exposed to untrusted input. More…
This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…
Lib.rs has been able to verify that all files in the crate's tarball are in the crate's repository. Please note that this check is still in beta, and absence of this confirmation does not mean that the files don't match.
Crates in the crates.io registry are tarball snapshots uploaded by crates' publishers. The registry is not using crates' git repositories, so there is a possibility that published crates have a misleading repository URL, or contain different code from the code in the repository.
To review the actual code of the crate, it's best to use cargo crev open libbz2-rs-sys
. Alternatively, you can download the tarball of libbz2-rs-sys v0.1.1 or view the source online.
libbz2-rs-sys mainly uses unsafe around the C FFI boundary, for libc interop, and for custom allocation support. Most end-user-facing decompression logic is in safe Rust. I have fuzzed and reviewed its code, and to the best of my ability I believe it's free of any serious security vulnerabilities.
libbz2-rs-sys only depends on the libc crate, which is widely used and maintained by the Rust project.