RUSTSEC-2021-0141
(unmaintained)
on 2021-12-24: dotenv is Unmaintained
This review is from Crev, a distributed system for code reviews. To add your review, set up cargo-crev.
0.15.0 (current) Thoroughness: Medium Understanding: Medium
by benluelo on 2022-01-18
Well known and highly used crate. No backdoors found; crate is fairly small. Very thorough test suite.
These reviews are from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet and submit your URL to its registry.
0.15.0 (current)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of salsa.debian.org.
Packaged for Debian (stable). Changelog:
- Team upload.
- Package dotenv 0.15.0 from crates.io using debcargo 2.4.0
- Neater way of installing the binary into /usr/lib/cargo
0.15.0 (current)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of git.savannah.gnu.org.
Packaged for Guix (crates-io)
cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.
- unknown
-
May have been packaged automatically without a review
- safe-to-run
-
This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…
Lib.rs has been able to verify that all files in the crate's tarball, except Cargo.lock,
are in the crate's repository. Please note that this check is still in beta, and absence of this confirmation does not mean that the files don't match.
Crates in the crates.io registry are tarball snapshots uploaded by crates' publishers. The registry is not using crates' git repositories, so there is a possibility that published crates have a misleading repository URL, or contain different code from the code in the repository.
To review the actual code of the crate, it's best to use cargo crev open dotenv. Alternatively, you can download the tarball of dotenv v0.15.0 or view the source online.
dotenv by description is meant to be used in development or testing only.
Using this in production may or may not be advisable.
Alternatives
The below may or may not be feasible alternative(s):