Lib.rs

› displaydoc › Reviews

These reviews are from Crev, a distributed system for code reviews. To add your review, set up cargo-crev.

0.2.4 (current) Rating: Positive Thoroughness: None Understanding: Low

by kpreid on 2023-09-13

Skimmed; looks fine and contains no surprises for a proc-macro crate.

The current version of displaydoc is 0.2.4.

0.1.6 (older version) Rating: Positive Thoroughness: Low Understanding: Low

by kornelski on 2020-05-04

Clever

These reviews are from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet and submit your URL to its registry.

The current version of displaydoc is 0.2.4.

0.2.3 (older version) safe-to-deploy

From mozilla/supply-chain copy of hg. By Makoto Kato.

This crate is convenient macros to implement core::fmt::Display trait. Although unsafe is used for test code to call libc::abort(), it has no unsafe code in this crate. And there is no file access. It meets the criteria for safe-to-deploy.

cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.

safe-to-deploy (implies safe-to-run)

This crate will not introduce a serious security vulnerability to production software exposed to untrusted input. More…

safe-to-run
Implied by other criteria

This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…

unknown

May have been packaged automatically without a review

Crates in the crates.io registry are tarball snapshots uploaded by crates' publishers. The registry is not using crates' git repositories. There is absolutely no guarantee that the repository URL declared by the crate belongs to the crate, or that the code in the repository is the code inside the published tarball.

To review the actual code of the crate, it's best to use cargo crev open displaydoc. Alternatively, you can download the tarball of displaydoc v0.2.4 or view the source online.