Lib.rs

These reviews are from Crev, a distributed system for code reviews. To add your review, set up cargo-crev.

1.0.0 (current) Rating: Positive Thoroughness: Low Understanding: Medium

by inflation on 2021-11-08

This crate is used by rustc itself

1.0.0 (current) Rating: Positive Thoroughness: Low Understanding: Medium

by leo60228 on 2021-09-28

only minor changes

1.0.0 (current) Rating: Strong Positive Thoroughness: High Understanding: High

by fkohlgrueber on 2021-09-10

Thorough review of the macro, looks correct. Repo is maintained.

1.0.0 (current) Rating: Strong Positive Thoroughness: Low Understanding: Medium

Approved without comment by 3541 on 2020-12-17

The current version of cfg-if is 1.0.0.

0.1.10 (older version) Rating: Positive Thoroughness: Medium Understanding: Low

by gitlab.com/chrysn on 2020-04-02

Straightforward macro-only crate.

0.1.10 (older version) Rating: Positive Thoroughness: Low Understanding: Low

by MaulingMonkey on 2019-09-25

Macro black magic... I trust the author and what I do understand looks good.

0.1.9 (older version) Rating: Strong Positive Thoroughness: Low Understanding: Medium

by git.sr.ht/~icefox on 2019-08-21

Does nothing but shuffle #[cfg] statements; harmless.

---

These reviews are from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet and submit your URL to its registry.

1.0.0 (current) safe-to-deploy

From bytecodealliance/wasmtime. By Alex Crichton.

I am the author of this crate.

1.0.0 (current) does-not-implement-crypto, safe-to-deploy

From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. Audited without comment by George Burgess IV.

1.0.0 (current) safe-to-run

From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. Audited without comment by Android Legacy.

1.0.0 (current) safe-to-deploy, does-not-implement-crypto, ub-risk-0

From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. By Lukasz Anforowicz.

I grepped for "unsafe", "crypt", "cipher", "fs", "net" - there were no hits. This is a really small crate (only lib.rs which is less than 200 lines + one end-to-end test) so I also skimmed through the macro's definition and everything looks okay to me.

1.0.0 (current) safe-to-run

From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of salsa.debian.org.

Packaged for Debian (stable). Changelog:

• Team upload.
• Package cfg-if 1.0.0 from crates.io using debcargo 2.4.3
• cfg-if 0.1 has been uploaded as a separate package as too many packages expects 0.1

1.0.0 (current) unknown

From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of git.savannah.gnu.org.

Packaged for Guix (crates-io)

cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.

safe-to-deploy (implies safe-to-run)

This crate will not introduce a serious security vulnerability to production software exposed to untrusted input. More…

safe-to-run

This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…

does-not-implement-crypto (implies crypto-safe)

Inspection reveals that the crate in question does not attempt to implement any cryptographic algorithms on its own.

Note that certification of this does not require an expert on all forms of cryptography: it's expected for crates we import to be "good enough" citizens, so they'll at least be forthcoming if they try to implement something cryptographic. When in doubt, please ask an expert.

crypto-safe

Implied by other criteria

All crypto algorithms in this crate have been reviewed by a relevant expert.

Note: If a crate does not implement crypto, use does-not-implement-crypto, which implies crypto-safe, but does not require expert review in order to audit for.

ub-risk-0 (implies ub-risk-1)

No unsafe code.

Full description of the audit criteria can be found at https://github.com/google/rust-crate-audits/blob/main/auditing_standards.md#ub-risk-0

ub-risk-1 (implies ub-risk-2)

Implied by other criteria

Excellent soundness.

Full description of the audit criteria can be found at https://github.com/google/rust-crate-audits/blob/main/auditing_standards.md#ub-risk-1

ub-risk-2 (implies ub-risk-3)

Implied by other criteria

Negligible unsoundness or average soundness.

Full description of the audit criteria can be found at https://github.com/google/rust-crate-audits/blob/main/auditing_standards.md#ub-risk-2

ub-risk-3 (implies ub-risk-4)

Implied by other criteria

Mild unsoundness or suboptimal soundness.

Full description of the audit criteria can be found at https://github.com/google/rust-crate-audits/blob/main/auditing_standards.md#ub-risk-3

ub-risk-4

Implied by other criteria

Extreme unsoundness.

Full description of the audit criteria can be found at https://github.com/google/rust-crate-audits/blob/main/auditing_standards.md#ub-risk-4

unknown

May have been packaged automatically without a review