22 releases (stable)
1.8.3 | Aug 29, 2024 |
---|---|
1.8.2 | Jul 2, 2024 |
1.8.1 | Jun 28, 2024 |
1.2.1 | Feb 10, 2024 |
0.5.3 | Dec 31, 2023 |
#258 in Network programming
1,694 downloads per month
84KB
1.5K
SLoC
girolle
Description
A nameko-rpc like lib in rust. Check the To-Do section to see limitation.
Do not use in production!
Girolle use Nameko architecture to send request and get response.
Documentation
User documentation and Rust documentation
Installation
cargo add girolle
Configuration
There is two way to create a configuration. The first one is to use the Config::with_yaml_defaults
function that will read a configuration from
a YAML file, see example. The second one is to create a configuration by hand.
Create a configuration from a yaml file
The configuration is done by a yaml file. It should be compliant with a Nameko one. The file should look like this:
AMQP_URI: 'amqp://toto:super@$172.16.1.1:5672//'
rpc_exchange: 'nameko-rpc'
max_workers: 10
parent_calls_tracked: 10
In this example:
- The
AMQP_URI
is the connection string to the RabbitMQ server. - The
rpc_exchange
is the exchange name for the rpc calls. - The
max_workers
is the max number of workers that will be created to handle the rpc calls. - The
parent_calls_tracked
is the number of parent calls that will be tracked by the service.
Create a configuration by hand
let conf = Config::default_config();
conf.with_amqp_uri("amqp://toto:super@localhost:5672/")
.with_rpc_exchange("nameko-rpc")
.with_max_workers(10)
.with_parent_calls_tracked(10);
Environment variables
The configuration supports the expansion of the environment variables with the
following syntax ${VAR_NAME}
. Like in this example:
AMQP_URI: 'amqp://${RABBITMQ_USER}:${RABBITMQ_PASSWORD}@${RABBITMQ_HOST}:${RABBITMQ_PORT}/%2f'
rpc_exchange: 'nameko-rpc'
max_workers: 10
parent_calls_tracked: 10
How to use it
The core concept is to remove the pain of the queue creation and reply by
mokcing the Nameko architecture with a RpcService
or RpcClient
, and to
use an abstract type serde_json::Value
to manipulate a serializable data.
if you do not use the macro #[girolle]
you need to create a function that
extract the data from the a &[Value]
like this:
fn fibonacci_reccursive(s: &[Value]) -> Result<Value> {
let n: u64 = serde_json::from_value(s[0].clone())?;
let result: Value = serde_json::to_value(fibonacci(n))?;
Ok(result)
}
Exemple
Create a simple service
use girolle::prelude::*;
use std::{thread, time};
#[girolle]
fn hello(s: String) -> String {
format!("Hello, {}!", s)
}
#[girolle]
fn sub(a: i64, b: i64) -> i64 {
a - b
}
#[girolle]
fn slip(n: u64) -> String {
thread::sleep(time::Duration::from_secs(n));
format!("Slept for {} seconds", n)
}
#[girolle]
fn fibonacci(n: u64) -> u64 {
if n <= 1 {
return n;
}
return fibonacci(n - 1) + fibonacci(n - 2);
}
fn main() {
let conf: Config = Config::with_yaml_defaults("staging/config.yml".to_string()).unwrap();
let _ = RpcService::new(conf, "video")
.register(hello)
.register(sub)
.register(slip)
.register(fibonacci)
.start();
}
Create multiple calls to service of methods, sync and async
use girolle::prelude::Payload;
use girolle::{serde_json, Config, RpcClient, Value};
use std::time::Instant;
use std::{thread, time};
#[tokio::main]
async fn main() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
// Load the configuration
let conf: Config = Config::with_yaml_defaults("staging/config.yml".to_string())?;
let service_name = "video";
// Create the client from the configuration
let mut rpc_client = RpcClient::new(conf);
// Register the service
rpc_client.register_service(service_name).await?;
// Start the client and the consumers
rpc_client.start().await?;
// Build the payload
let p = Payload::new().arg(30);
// Send the request sync
let new_result = rpc_client.send(service_name, "fibonacci", p)?;
// Deserialize the result
let fib_result: u64 = serde_json::from_value(new_result.get_value())?;
// Print the result
println!("fibonacci :{:?}", fib_result);
assert_eq!(fib_result, 832040);
// Close the client
rpc_client.unregister_service(service_name)?;
rpc_client.close().await?;
Ok(())
}
Stack
Girolle use lapin as an AMQP client/server library.
Supported features
- create a client
- create a proxy service in rust to interact with an other service
- Create a simple service
- Handle the error
- write test
- Add macro to simplify the creation of a service
- Add basic macro
- fix macro to handle
return
- fix macro to handle recursive function
- listen to a pub/sub queue
nameko-client
The Girolle client got the basic features to send sync request and async resquest. I'm not really happy about the way it need to interact with. I would like to find a more elegant way like in the nameko. But it works, and it is not really painfull to use.
nameko-rpc
The RpcService and the macro procedural are the core of the lib. It does not suppport proxy, i know that's one of the most important feature of the Nameko lib. I will try to implement it in the future. But i think i need a bit refactor the non-oriented object aspect of Rust make it harder.
nameko-pubsub
The PubSub service is not at all implemented. I dunno if that's something i'm interested in.
nameko-web
The web service is not implemented. I'm not sure if i will implement it. I need to rework the client to be make it 100% thread safe. It should be a commun subject with the proxy.
Limitation
The current code as been tested with the nameko and girolle examples in this repository.
nameko_test.py | simple_sender.rs | |
---|---|---|
nameko_service.py | x | x |
simple_macro | x | x |
Benchmark
Simple message benchmark
nameko_test.py | simple_sender.rs | |
---|---|---|
nameko_service.py | 15.587 s | 11.532 s |
simple_macro.rs | 15.654 s | 8.078 s |
Client benchmark
Using hyperfine to test the client benchmark.
Girolle client ( with Girolle service )
hyperfine -N './target/release/examples/simple_sender'
Benchmark 1: ./target/release/examples/simple_sender
Time (mean ± σ): 9.995 s ± 0.116 s [User: 0.163 s, System: 0.197 s]
Range (min … max): 9.778 s … 10.176 s 10 runs
Nameko client ( with Girolle service )
hyperfine -N --warmup 3 'python nameko_test.py'
Benchmark 1: python nameko_test.py
Time (mean ± σ): 15.654 s ± 0.257 s [User: 1.455 s, System: 0.407 s]
Range (min … max): 15.202 s … 15.939 s 10 runs
Service benchmark
Girolle service ( with Girolle client )
hyperfine -N './target/release/examples/simple_sender'
Benchmark 1: ./target/release/examples/simple_sender
Time (mean ± σ): 9.995 s ± 0.116 s [User: 0.163 s, System: 0.197 s]
Range (min … max): 9.778 s … 10.176 s 10 runs
Nameko service running python 3.9.15 ( with Girolle client )
hyperfine -N --warmup 3 'target/release/examples/simple_sender'
Benchmark 1: target/release/examples/simple_sender
Time (mean ± σ): 11.532 s ± 0.091 s [User: 0.199 s, System: 0.213 s]
Range (min … max): 11.396 s … 11.670 s 10 runs
Nameko service running python 3.9.15 ( with Nameko client )
hyperfine -N --warmup 3 'python nameko_test.py'
Benchmark 1: python nameko_test.py
Time (mean ± σ): 15.587 s ± 0.325 s [User: 1.443 s, System: 0.420 s]
Range (min … max): 15.181 s … 16.034 s 10 runs
Fibonacci benchmark
The benchmark use a static set of random int to compute fibonacci.
nameko_fib_payload.py | |
---|---|
nameko_service.py | 03 min 58.11 s |
simple_macro.rs | 6.99 s |
Macro-overhead benchmark
The benchmark is done to test the overhead of the macro.
Dependencies
~16–29MB
~452K SLoC