3 releases

0.1.2 Sep 10, 2023
0.1.1 Sep 4, 2023
0.1.0 Sep 3, 2023

#77 in FFI

50 downloads per month

Apache-2.0

30KB
351 lines

fmtbuf

Write a formatted string into a fixed buffer. This is useful when you have a user-provided buffer you want to write into, which frequently arises when writing foreign function interfaces for C, where strings are expected to have a null terminator.

Usage

use fmtbuf::WriteBuf;
use std::fmt::Write;

fn main() {
    let mut buf: [u8; 10] = [0; 10];
    let mut writer = WriteBuf::new(&mut buf);
    if let Err(e) = write!(&mut writer, "πŸš€πŸš€πŸš€") {
        println!("write error: {e:?}");
    }
    let written_len = match writer.finish_with("\0") {
        Ok(len) => len, // <- won't be hit since πŸš€πŸš€πŸš€ is 12 bytes
        Err(len) => {
            println!("writing was truncated");
            len
        }
    };
    let written = &buf[..written_len];
    println!("wrote {written_len} bytes: {written:?}");
    println!("result: {:?}", std::str::from_utf8(written));
}

πŸš€πŸš€

The primary use case is for implementing APIs like strerror_r, where the user provides the buffer.

use std::{ffi, fmt::Write, io::Error};
use fmtbuf::WriteBuf;

#[no_mangle]
pub unsafe extern "C" fn mylib_strerror(
    err: *mut Error,
    buf: *mut ffi::c_char,
    buf_len: usize
) {
    let mut buf = unsafe {
        // Buffer provided by a users
        std::slice::from_raw_parts_mut(buf as *mut u8, buf_len)
    };
    // Reserve at least 1 byte at the end because we will always
    // write '\0'
    let mut writer = WriteBuf::with_reserve(buf, 1);

    // Use the standard `write!` macro (no error handling for
    // brevity) -- note that an error here might only indicate
    // write truncation, which is handled gracefully be this
    // library's finish___ functions
    let _ = write!(writer, "{}", err.as_ref().unwrap());

    // null-terminate buffer or add "..." if it was truncated
    let _written_len = writer.finish_with_or(b"\0", b"...\0")
        // Err value is also number of bytes written
        .unwrap_or_else(|e| e);
}

Features

!#[no_std]

Support for !#[no_std] is enabled by disabling the default features and not re-enabling the "std" feature.

fmtbuf = { version = "*", default_features = false }

F.A.Q.

Why not write to &mut [u8]?

The Rust Standard Library trait std::io::Write is implemented for &mut [u8] which could be used instead of this library. The problem with this approach is the lack of UTF-8 encoding support (also, it is not available in #![no_std]).

use std::io::{Cursor, Write};

fn main() {
    let mut buf: [u8; 10] = [0; 10];
    let mut writer = Cursor::<&mut [u8]>::new(&mut buf);
    if let Err(e) = write!(&mut writer, "rocket: πŸš€") {
        println!("write error: {e:?}");
    }
    let written_len = writer.position() as usize;
    let written = &buf[..written_len];
    println!("wrote {written_len} bytes: {written:?}");
    println!("result: {:?}", std::str::from_utf8(written));
}

Running this program will show you the error:

write error: Error { kind: WriteZero, message: "failed to write whole buffer" }
wrote 10 bytes: [114, 111, 99, 107, 101, 116, 58, 32, 240, 159]
result: Err(Utf8Error { valid_up_to: 8, error_len: None })

The problem is that "rocket: πŸš€" is encoded as a 12 byte sequence -- the πŸš€ emoji is encoded in UTF-8 as the 4 bytes b"\xf0\x9f\x9a\x80" -- but our target buffer is only 10 bytes long. The write! to the cursor naΓ―vely cuts off the πŸš€ mid-encode, making the encoded string invalid UTF-8, even though it advanced the cursor the entire 10 bytes. This is expected, since std::io::Write comes from io and does not know anything about string encoding; it operates on the u8 level.

One could use the std::str::Utf8Error to properly cut off the buf. The only issue with this is performance. Since std::str::from_utf8 scans the whole string moving forward, it costs O(n) to test this, whereas fmtbuf will do this in O(1), since it only looks at the final few bytes.

What about Unicode weird format characters?

This library only guarantees that the contents of the target buffer is valid UTF-8. It does not make any guarantees of semantics resulting from truncation due to the Unicode format characters, specifically U+200D, U+200E, and U+200F.

What?

If you don't know what those are, that's okay. Suffice it to say that human language is complicated and Unicode has a set a features to make things possible, but when you run out of space to store that in your fixed-size buffer, things go awry. If you're looking for details, see the mini sections below.

U+200D: Zero Width Joiner

Certain graphemes like "πŸ™‡β€β™€" (which you might see as two separate graphemes) are comprised of three code points:

  1. πŸ™‡ U+1F647 "Person Bowing Deeply"
  2. U+200D "Zero Width Joiner"
  3. ♀ U+2640 "Female Sign"

So the single grapheme is the 10 byte sequence b"\xf0\x9f\x99\x87\xe2\x80\x8d\xe2\x99\x80". The question arises: What should happen if the buffer size is only 9? On truncation, this library will discard code points which are meant to be modifiers. This library will truncate the last Unicode code point, leaving you with b"\xf0\x9f\x99\x87\xe2\x80\x8d"--a person bowing and a zero-width joiner joining with nothing, as the female modifier can not fit.

U+200E and U+200F: Direction Markers

Consider Arabic, which is a right-to-left language:

‏ؒمل Ψ£Ω† ΩŠΨ­Ω„ β€ŽRust‏ Ω…Ψ­Ω„ β€ŽC++‏ ΩŠΩˆΩ…Ω‹Ψ§ Ω…Ψ§.β€Ž

Depending on how compliant with right-to-left presentation your text editor or browser is, you might see that text any number of ways (if "Ψ’Ω…Ω„" on the right-hand side of the text, then the presentation is working). But note the borrowed words "Rust" and "C++" are still spelled in a left-to-right manner within the right-to-left text (or they should be). This is done by encoding U+200E left-to-right mark, then writing the borrowed text, then U+200F right-to-left mark to continue.

What happens if text is reversed, but there is not enough space in the buffer to flip it back? On truncation, this library might leave you in the middle of a text-reversed run.

The construction of Egyptian Hieroglyphs and other languages of this sort face a similar issue. Where should the cutoff be? This library does not know the difference between "π“ͺπ“Œπ“ƒ»" and "π“ͺπ“Œ". Figuring that out is the responsibility of a higher-level construct.

No runtime deps