3 unstable releases

0.2.0 Jan 4, 2022
0.1.1 Jan 11, 2021
0.1.0 Jan 8, 2021

#2141 in Procedural macros

Download history 6028/week @ 2024-07-20 5722/week @ 2024-07-27 3490/week @ 2024-08-03 5225/week @ 2024-08-10 5572/week @ 2024-08-17 5301/week @ 2024-08-24 5936/week @ 2024-08-31 7109/week @ 2024-09-07 6683/week @ 2024-09-14 7044/week @ 2024-09-21 7762/week @ 2024-09-28 8692/week @ 2024-10-05 7053/week @ 2024-10-12 8063/week @ 2024-10-19 6824/week @ 2024-10-26 4203/week @ 2024-11-02

27,538 downloads per month
Used in 2 crates

MIT license

11KB
202 lines

field_names

Build Status Latest Version

field_names is a Rust crate to expose a field or variant names from source code as strings at runtime.

Example

Consider a simple struct such as this one.

#[derive(FieldNames)]
struct Example {
    hello: String,
    world: String,
    #[field_names(skip)]
    ignore_me: bool,
}

field_names will emit the following:

#[automatically_derived]
impl Example {
    const FIELDS: [&'static str; 2] = [
        "hello",
        "world",
    ];
}

Enums are the same:

#[derive(VariantNames)]
enum Example {
    Hello(String),
    #[variant_names(skip)]
    Secret(String),
    World,
}

field_names will emit the following:

#[automatically_derived]
impl Example {
    const VARIANTS: [&'static str; 2] = [
        "Hello",
        "World",
    ];
}

Uses

This crate was originally created for a case where a set of rules were being read at runtime which referenced fields of structs elsewhere in the code base. The referenced struct exposed a method which had a match statement to go from strings to its fields, but there was not a way to ensure the arms of that match statement stayed in sync with the struct definition. With this crate, a unit test could be created to ensure that every field on the struct - except those deliberately omitted - was handled by the method.

This crate can also be used to enforce relationships among structs and enums at unit-test time that cannot be expressed at compile-time. See tests/keep_in_sync for an example and explanation of that scenario.

FAQs

Why aren't FieldNames and VariantNames traits?

Using field_names is an implementation convenience; it shouldn't force you to change your crate's public API.

How do I make FIELDS or VARIANTS public?

You can add your own inherent method, e.g. fields() -> &[&'static str], or define a trait that matches your use-case and reference FIELDS in the trait implementation.

Can I get field names for an enum variant?

This currently isn't supported, using newtype variants and separate structs per variant is currently the recommended approach. You can use the from_variants crate to auto-generate conversions from those structs into the enum.

Dependencies

~2MB
~44K SLoC