3 releases
0.1.2 | Feb 20, 2024 |
---|---|
0.1.1 | Feb 20, 2024 |
0.1.0 | Feb 20, 2024 |
#476 in Programming languages
2KB
续命
Note
DO NOT USE THIS IN ANY CODE YOU DON'T WANT MESS UP
Why?
You want to expand some lifetime without either call *::leak()
How?
An issue had opened for decades
In essence, it's because static checking of multi-level lifetimes itself is inherently complex
Credits
Also check examples in cve-rs,
to find 'what kind of memory vulnerabilities we could face with unconditional lifetime expand'?