6 releases
0.2.1 | Jul 19, 2023 |
---|---|
0.2.0 | Jul 19, 2023 |
0.1.2 | Jul 4, 2020 |
0.1.1 | Jul 4, 2020 |
0.1.0 | Jul 4, 2020 |
#2054 in Procedural macros
5,221 downloads per month
Used in 8 crates
(via defile)
4KB
::defile
Helper proc-macro to "ungroup" a captured metavariable (thus potentially breaking their hygiene, hence the name).
This is useful when using helper macro_rules
macros, that need to parse using some special rule (e.g. :expr
, :path
, :pat
), but that later want to further inspect the captured variable.
This is not something a macro_rules!
can do on its own, since such so-called metavariables are seen as an opaque single token (:tt
) (the sequence of tokens captured in the metavariable have been grouped (≈ parenthesized) but using invisible parenthesis.
Example
macro_rules! check_expr {
(
42
) => ({
println!("Got `42`!");
});
(
$($tt:tt)*
) => ({
println!("Did not get `42`. Instead, got the following tokens:\n[");
$(
println!(" `{}`,", stringify!($tt));
)*
println!("]");
});
}
macro_rules! check_all_exprs {(
$(
$expr:expr // use :expr to be able to use `,` as a delimiter
),* $(,)?
) => (
fn main () {
$(
println!("vvvvvvvvvvvvv");
check_expr!($expr);
println!("^^^^^^^^^^^^^\n");
)*
}
)}
check_all_exprs!(42, 1 + 1);
outputs:
vvvvvvvvvvvvv
Did not get `42`. Instead, got the following tokens:
[
`42`,
]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
vvvvvvvvvvvvv
Did not get `42`. Instead, got the following tokens:
[
`1 + 1`,
]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-
That is:
-
The token
42
does not match42
! -
That being said, the expression
1 + 1
is viewed as a single indivisible token too.Indeed, that's kind of the point of this behavior: if we do
2 * $expr
where$expr
captures1 + 1
we expect the result to be2 * (1 + 1)
instead of2 * 1 + 1
!
-
But by doing:
macro_rules! check_all_exprs {(
$(
$expr:expr // use :expr to be able to use `,` as a delimiter
),* $(,)?
) => (::defile::defile! { // 👈
fn main () {
$(
println!("vvvvvvvvvvvvv");
check_expr!(@$expr);
// 👆
println!("^^^^^^^^^^^^^\n");
)*
}
})}
we do get:
vvvvvvvvvvvvv
Got `42`!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
vvvvvvvvvvvvv
Did not get `42`. Instead, got the following tokens:
[
`1`,
`+`,
`1`,
]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
42
has matched the literal 42, but be aware that this has also resulted in1 + 1
getting split. So, if you were todefile
expressions such as2 * @$expr
, you may not obtain the expected result! Use with caution.
Caveats
Currently (1.45.0
), there are several bugs regarding the interaction between
macro_rules!
macros and procedural macros, that may lead to defile!
and any
other helper procedural macro to split groups that are not @
-prefixed.
Hopefully those bugs are solved, making the actual implementation of defile!
meaningful.