1 unstable release
Uses old Rust 2015
0.0.1 | Mar 9, 2015 |
---|
#43 in #shared-data
19KB
350 lines
spinlock-rs
A spinlock implementation in rust
Build
Run cargo build
Usage
The library implements a Reader/Writer lock. When locking a spin lock for shared Read access, you will get a reference to the protected data, and while locking for an exclusive Write access, you will get a mutable reference.
extern crate spinlock;
use spinlock::SpinLock;
fn main() {
let spin = SpinLock::new(0);
// Write access
{
let mut data = spin.write().unwrap();
*data += 1;
}
// Read access
{
let data = spin.read().unwrap();
println!("{}", *data);
}
}
Please note that the spinlock doesn't deal itself with reference counting. You
might want to use Arc<SpinLock<T>>
to share the lock between threads.
Credits
The implementation is derived from the spinlock implementation written by Matt Dillon for DragonFlyBSD
lib.rs
:
A reader/writer spin lock implementation. A spin lock is a particular kind of lock which will not put the thread to sleep when it tries to acquire a lock already hold by another thread or codepath. Instead, the thread will spin on the lock, which means it will loop trying to acquire it again and again.
Timeouts
This implementation has a timeout. Spinlock are fast but should only be used to protect short
critical sections and a lock holder should only hold the lock for a very short period of time
to avoid wasting CPU cycles. If a thread tries to acquire a lock for more than MAX_WAIT
nanoseconds, it will panic.
Optimistic
The implementation is Optimistic. The acquire codepath assumes that the lock operation will
succeed and doesn't try to minimize the cost of the initial acquire operation. If the access
is contested, the implementation then tries to minimize the pressure on the CPU cache until it
it can actually acquire the lock.
After SPIN_COUNT
retries, the acquire path will call thread::yield_now()
between each retry
to allow for other threads to run and drop the lock.
Favor exclusive access
If a thread is spinning in an contested exclusive access attempt, no new shared access will be granted. This is designed to avoid Reader DOSing the Writers.
Poisonning
If an exclusive holder panics while holding the lock, it might void the coherency rules. Indeed, the protected data might be in a state in which it is not supposed to be. To prevent this, if an exclusive holder panics, the lock is poisonned and no other access to the lock will be granted.
Dependencies
~735KB
~13K SLoC