0.3.1 (older version) Thoroughness: Low Understanding: None
by Minoru on 2021-07-22
These reviews are from Crev, a distributed system for code reviews. To add your review, set up cargo-crev.
The current version of rand_hc is 0.3.2.
0.3.0 (older version) Thoroughness: Low Understanding: Low
by mgeisler on 2021-05-07
No unsafe code, has tests and references to the original implementation.
0.3.0 (older version) Thoroughness: Low Understanding: None
by Minoru on 2021-05-01
Show review…
This is an implementation of an HC-128 RNG.
The crate has no unsafe, and doesn't seem to do anything obviously fishy.
I didn't compare the algorithm to the relevant paper though, so I don't vouch
this is a faithful implementation.
These reviews are from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet and submit your URL to its registry.
The current version of rand_hc is 0.3.2.
0.3.1 (older version)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of git.savannah.gnu.org.
Packaged for Guix (crates-io)
0.2.0 (older version)
From divviup/libprio-rs. Audited without comment by David Cook.
cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.
- safe-to-run
-
This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…
- unknown
-
May have been packaged automatically without a review
Crates in the crates.io registry are tarball snapshots uploaded by crates' publishers. The registry is not using crates' git repositories. There is absolutely no guarantee that the repository URL declared by the crate belongs to the crate, or that the code in the repository is the code inside the published tarball.
To review the actual code of the crate, it's best to use cargo crev open rand_hc. Alternatively, you can download the tarball of rand_hc v0.3.2 or view the source online.
Version 0.3.1 adjusts links in Cargo.toml and disables a few Clippy lints. There are no material changes to the crate, so my previous review stands.