11 releases
Uses new Rust 2024
| new 0.2.5 | Dec 3, 2025 |
|---|---|
| 0.2.4 | Nov 23, 2025 |
| 0.2.1 | Oct 31, 2025 |
| 0.1.4 | Sep 25, 2025 |
#2098 in Algorithms
Used in deep_causality_discovery
685KB
13K
SLoC
🔬 deep_causality_algorithms 🔬
A collection of computational causality algorithms used in the DeepCausality project. This crate provides tools for analyzing and decomposing causal relationships in complex systems.
The cornerstone of this crate is surd_states, a high-performance Rust implementation of the SURD-states algorithm.
Based on the paper "Observational causality by states and interaction type for scientific discovery" (
martínezsánchez2025), this algorithm decomposes the mutual information between a set of source variables and a target
variable into its fundamental components: Synergistic, Unique, and Redundant (SURD).
This decomposition allows for a deep, nuanced understanding of causal structures, moving beyond simple correlations to reveal the nature of multi-variable interactions.
Key Features
- Faithful & Performant Implementation: A high-performance, mathematically faithful Rust port of the SURD-states algorithm, optimized for speed and memory efficiency.
- Rich Causal Decomposition: Decomposes the total causal influence into:
- Redundant (R): Overlapping information provided by multiple sources.
- Unique (U): Information provided by a single source independently.
- Synergistic (S): New information that emerges only from the combination of sources.
- State-Dependent Analysis: Provides detailed state-dependent maps that reveal how causal influences change based on the system's current state.
- Information Leak Quantification: Explicitly calculates the "information leak," which quantifies the influence of unobserved variables or inherent randomness in the system.
- Robust Incomplete Data Handling (CDL Variant): The
surd_states_cdlfunction provides a variant of the SURD-states algorithm specifically designed to gracefully manage missing or undefined probability values (NoneinCausalTensor<Option<f64>>). This is crucial for real-world datasets where data incompleteness is common, allowing for meaningful causal insights even with partial information by ignoringNonevalues in calculations and propagating uncertainty. - Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) Feature Selection: Implements the mRMR algorithm to select features that are maximally relevant to a target variable and minimally redundant among themselves. The algorithm now returns a ranked list of features along with their normalized importance scores (between 0.0 and 1.0), providing a clear indication of each feature's contribution.
- Performance Optimized:
- Algorithmic Capping: Use the
MaxOrderenum to limit the analysis to a tractable number of interactions ( e.g., pairwise), reducing complexity from exponentialO(2^N)to polynomialO(N^k). - Parallel Execution: When compiled with the
parallelfeature flag, the main decomposition loop of the SURD algorithm and the feature selection loops of the mRMR algorithm run in parallel across all available CPU cores usingrayon.
- Algorithmic Capping: Use the
Installation
cargo add deep_causality_algorithms
Usage
The primary function is surd_states, which takes a CausalTensor representing a joint probability distribution and
returns a SurdResult.
use deep_causality_algorithms::{surd_states, MaxOrder};
use deep_causality_data_structures::CausalTensor;
// Create a joint probability distribution for a target and 2 source variables.
// Shape: [target_states, source1_states, source2_states] = [2, 2, 2]
let data = vec![
0.1, 0.2, // P(T=0, S1=0, S2=0), P(T=0, S1=0, S2=1)
0.0, 0.2, // P(T=0, S1=1, S2=0), P(T=0, S1=1, S2=1)
0.3, 0.0, // P(T=1, S1=0, S2=0), P(T=1, S1=0, S2=1)
0.1, 0.1, // P(T=1, S1=1, S2=0), P(T=1, S1=1, S2=1)
];
let p_raw = CausalTensor::new(data, vec![2, 2, 2]).unwrap();
// Perform a full decomposition (k=N=2)
let full_result = surd_states(&p_raw, MaxOrder::Max).unwrap();
// Print the detailed decomposition
println!("{}", &full_result);
// Access specific results
println!("Information Leak: {:.3}", full_result.info_leak());
// Synergistic information for the pair of variables {1, 2}
if let Some(synergy) = full_result.synergistic_info().get(&vec![1, 2]) {
println!("Synergistic Info for {{1, 2}}: {:.3}", synergy);
}
Handling Incomplete Data with surd_states_cdl
For datasets containing missing or incomplete information, the surd_states_cdl function provides a robust solution. It
operates on CausalTensor<Option<f64>>, gracefully handling None values by ignoring them in calculations and
propagating uncertainty, allowing for causal discovery even with partial data.
use deep_causality_algorithms::{surd_states_cdl, MaxOrder};
use deep_causality_data_structures::CausalTensor;
// Create a joint probability distribution with missing data (None values).
// Shape: [target_states, source1_states, source2_states] = [2, 2, 2]
let data_with_nones = vec![
Some(0.1), Some(0.2), // P(T=0, S1=0, S2=0), P(T=0, S1=0, S2=1)
None, Some(0.2), // P(T=0, S1=1, S2=0) is missing, P(T=0, S1=1, S2=1)
Some(0.3), None, // P(T=1, S1=0, S2=0), P(T=1, S1=0, S2=1) is missing
Some(0.1), Some(0.1), // P(T=1, S1=1, S2=0), P(T=1, S1=1, S2=1)
];
let p_raw_with_nones = CausalTensor::new(data_with_nones, vec![2, 2, 2]).unwrap();
// Perform a full decomposition with None handling
let full_result_cdl = surd_states_cdl(&p_raw_with_nones, MaxOrder::Max).unwrap();
// Print the detailed decomposition
println!("CDL Result: {}", &full_result_cdl);
// Access specific results
println!("CDL Information Leak: {:.3}", full_result_cdl.info_leak());
Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) Feature Selection
The mRMR algorithm is a powerful tool for selecting a subset of features that are maximally relevant to a target variable and minimally redundant among themselves. This helps in reducing dimensionality and focusing causal analysis on the most informative variables. The implementation now returns a ranked list of features along with their normalized importance scores (between 0.0 and 1.0).
use deep_causality_algorithms::mrmr::mrmr_features_selector;
use deep_causality_tensor::CausalTensor;
let data = vec![
10.0, 12.0, 1.0, 11.0,
20.0, 21.0, 5.0, 22.0,
30.0, 33.0, 2.0, 31.0,
40.0, 40.0, 8.0, 43.0,
50.0, 55.0, 3.0, 52.0,
];
let mut tensor = CausalTensor::new(data, vec![5, 4]).unwrap();
// Select 2 features, with the target variable in column 3.
let selected_features_with_scores = mrmr_features_selector(&mut tensor, 2, 3).unwrap();
println!("Selected Features and Scores: {:?}", selected_features_with_scores);
A higher mRMR score (and thus a higher normalized importance score) indicates that the feature is not only highly relevant to the target but also provides new, non-redundant information compared to the features already chosen. It's a measure of a feature's unique and strong contribution to predicting the target within the context of the selected feature set.
From Discovery to Model: Connecting SURD to DeepCausality
The surd_states algorithm serves as a bridge from observational data to executable causal models with the
DeepCausality.
1. Mapping Causal Links to CausaloidGraph Structure
The aggregate SURD results inform the structure of the CausaloidGraph.
- A strong unique influence from
S1toTsuggests a direct edge:Causaloid(S1) -> Causaloid(T). - A strong synergistic influence from
S1andS2ontoTsuggests a many-to-one connection whereCausaloid(S1)andCausaloid(S2)both point toCausaloid(T). - A high information leak suggests that the
CausaloidforTshould model a high degree of internal randomness or dependency on an unobservedContext.
2. Mapping State-Dependency to Causaloid Logic
The state-dependent maps provide the exact conditional logic for a Causaloid's causal_fn. For example, if SURD shows
that S1's influence on T is strong only when S1 > 0, this condition can be programmed directly into the
Causaloid.
3. Modeling Multiple Causes with CausaloidCollection
SURD's ability to detect multi-causal relationships is perfectly complemented by the CausaloidCollection, which models
the interplay of multiple factors. The SURD results guide the choice of the collection's AggregateLogic:
- Strong SYNERGY (e.g., A and B are required for C) maps to
AggregateLogic::All(Conjunction). - Strong UNIQUE or REDUNDANT influences (e.g., A or B can cause C) maps to
AggregateLogic::Any(Disjunction). - Complex mixed influences (e.g., any two of three factors cause C) maps to
AggregateLogic::Some(k)(Threshold).
In summary, surd_states provides the data-driven evidence to identify multi-causal structures, and the DeepCausality
primitives provide the formal mechanisms to build an executable model of that precise structure.
Example: Decomposing Causal Structure
The crate includes a detailed example (example_surd) that demonstrates how to use the surd_states algorithm and,
more importantly, how to interpret its rich output. It runs through several test cases with different underlying causal
structures (e.g., synergistic, noisy, random) and explains what each part of the output means.
To run the example:
cargo run --example example_surd
For a detailed walkthrough of the output, see the example's README.
👨💻👩💻 Contribution
Contributions are welcomed especially related to documentation, example code, and fixes. If unsure where to start, just open an issue and ask.
Unless you explicitly state otherwise, any contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in deep_causality by you, shall be licensed under the MIT licence, without any additional terms or conditions.
📜 Licence
This project is licensed under the MIT license.
👮️ Security
For details about security, please read the security policy.
💻 Author
- Marvin Hansen.
- Github GPG key ID: 369D5A0B210D39BC
- GPG Fingerprint: 4B18 F7B2 04B9 7A72 967E 663E 369D 5A0B 210D 39BC
Dependencies
~195–450KB