5 releases
0.1.4 | Jun 23, 2024 |
---|---|
0.1.3 | Jun 21, 2024 |
0.1.2 | Jun 20, 2024 |
0.1.1 | Jun 20, 2024 |
0.1.0 | Jun 20, 2024 |
#943 in Encoding
186 downloads per month
58KB
954 lines
Consistent Overhead Byte Stuffing (COBS)
Rust functions for encoding and decoding COBS.
Intro
This crate provides functions for encoding and decoding of COBS, and a minor variant of COBS known as COBS/R.
What Is COBS?
COBS is a method of encoding a packet of bytes into a form that contains no
bytes with value zero (0x00
). The input packet of bytes can contain bytes
in the full range of 0x00
to 0xFF
. The COBS encoded packet is guaranteed to
generate packets with bytes only in the range 0x01
to 0xFF
. Thus, in a
communication protocol, packet boundaries can be reliably delimited with 0x00
bytes.
The COBS encoding does have to increase the packet size to achieve this encoding. However, compared to other byte-stuffing methods, the packet size increase is reasonable and predictable. COBS always adds 1 byte to the message length. Additionally, for longer packets of length n, it may add n/254 (rounded down) additional bytes to the encoded packet size.
For example, compare to the PPP protocol, which uses 0x7E
bytes to delimit
PPP packets. The PPP protocol uses an "escape" style of byte stuffing,
replacing all occurences of 0x7E
bytes in the packet with 0x7D 0x5E
. But
that byte-stuffing method can potentially double the size of the packet in the
worst case. COBS uses a different method for byte-stuffing, which has a much
more reasonable worst-case overhead.
For more details about COBS, see the references.
I have included a variant on COBS, COBS/R, which slightly modifies COBS to often avoid the +1 byte overhead of COBS. So in many cases, especially for smaller packets, the size of a COBS/R encoded packet is the same size as the original packet. See below for more details about COBS/R.
References
Consistent Overhead Byte Stuffing
Stuart Cheshire and Mary Baker
IEEE/ACM Transations on Networking, Vol. 7, No. 2, April 1999
Consistent Overhead Byte Stuffing (for IEEE)
http://www.stuartcheshire.org/papers/COBSforToN.pdf
PPP Consistent Overhead Byte Stuffing (COBS)
PPP Working Group Internet Draft
James Carlson, IronBridge Networks
Stuart Cheshire and Mary Baker, Stanford University
November 1997
PPP Consistent Overhead Byte Stuffing (COBS)
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pppext-cobs-00
Modules Provided
cobs2::cobs
— Consistent Overhead Byte Stuffing (basic method)cobs2::cobsr
— COBS/R — Consistent Overhead Byte Stuffing—Reduced
"Consistent Overhead Byte Stuffing—Reduced" (COBS/R) is my own invention, a modification of basic COBS encoding, and is described in more detail below.
The following are not implemented:
- COBS/ZPE — Consistent Overhead Byte Stuffing—Zero Pair Elimination
- COBS/ZRE — Consistent Overhead Byte Stuffing—Zero Run Elimination
Usage
The modules provide functions for encoding and decoding. Several implementations are provided, which differ in the input and output data types.
- Arrays (no_std)
encode_array()
decode_array()
- Vectors
encode_vector()
decode_vector()
- Iterators
encode_iter()
decode_iter()
encode_ref_iter()
decode_ref_iter()
Unit Testing
Unit testing is implemented:
cargo test
License
The code is released under the MIT license. See LICENSE.txt for details.
Consistent Overhead Byte Stuffing—Reduced (COBS/R)
A modification of COBS, which I'm calling "Consistent Overhead Byte
Stuffing—Reduced" (COBS/R), is provided in the cobs2::cobsr
module. Its
purpose is to save one byte from the encoded form in some cases. Plain COBS
encoding always has a +1 byte encoding overhead. See the references for
details. COBS/R can often avoid the +1 byte, which can be a useful
savings if it is mostly small messages that are being encoded.
In plain COBS, the last length code byte in the message has some inherent redundancy: if it is greater than the number of remaining bytes, this is detected as an error.
In COBS/R, instead we opportunistically replace the final length code byte with the final data byte, whenever the value of the final data byte is greater than or equal to what the final length value would normally be. This variation can be unambiguously decoded: the decoder notices that the length code is greater than the number of remaining bytes.
Examples
The byte values in the examples are in hex.
First example
Input:
2F A2 00 92 73 02
This example is encoded the same in COBS and COBS/R. Encoded (length code bytes are highlighted):
03 2F A2 04 92 73 02
Second example
The second example is almost the same, except the final data byte value is greater than what the length byte would be.
Input:
2F A2 00 92 73 26
Encoded in plain COBS (length code bytes are highlighted):
03 2F A2 04 92 73 26
Encoded in COBS/R:
03 2F A2 26 92 73
Because the last data byte (26
) is greater than the usual length code
(04
), the last data byte can be inserted in place of the length code, and
removed from the end of the sequence. This avoids the usual +1 byte overhead of
the COBS encoding.
The decoder detects this variation on the encoding simply by detecting that the length code is greater than the number of remaining bytes. That situation would be a decoding error in regular COBS, but in COBS/R it is used to save one byte in the encoded message.