nightly caffe2-tensor


3 releases

0.1.5-alpha.0 Mar 25, 2023
0.1.4-alpha.0 Mar 2, 2023
0.1.3-alpha.0 Mar 1, 2023
Download history 137/week @ 2023-05-30 81/week @ 2023-06-06 235/week @ 2023-06-13 457/week @ 2023-06-20 216/week @ 2023-06-27 716/week @ 2023-07-04 190/week @ 2023-07-11 536/week @ 2023-07-18 336/week @ 2023-07-25 133/week @ 2023-08-01 252/week @ 2023-08-08 242/week @ 2023-08-15 126/week @ 2023-08-22 130/week @ 2023-08-29 253/week @ 2023-09-05 190/week @ 2023-09-12

699 downloads per month
Used in 230 crates (77 directly)




This Rust crate is a translation of the caffe2 operator library and provides tensor-related functionality. It is still in the process of being translated from the original C++ implementation, so some function bodies may not be fully translated yet.

The crate contains several key types, including Tensor, TensorCPU, TensorCUDA, and Int8TensorCPU, which represent different types of tensors and their storage. Tensors can be resized, reshaped, and copied, and their data can be accessed and modified. The crate also includes functions for filling tensors with values and for accessing tensor metadata.

One important feature of the crate is the ability to share data between tensors, either through cloning or through external pointers. Tensors can also be resized and reshaped without reallocating memory, as long as their new shape is compatible with their existing shape.

The crate also includes several utility functions, including a tensor printer, a shape function, and a function for creating tensors filled with specific values.

Overall, the caffe2-tensor crate provides a powerful set of tools for working with tensors in Rust. However, it is still a work in progress, so some features may not be fully implemented yet.

12> why do we need different tensor types for different storage locations?

Different tensor types are needed for different storage locations because the underlying storage for tensors can be located in different memory spaces, such as CPU memory or GPU memory. The tensor type determines the device on which the tensor resides, as well as the data type and shape of the tensor.

For example, a TensorCPU type would be used for tensors that are stored in CPU memory, while a TensorCUDA type would be used for tensors that are stored in GPU memory. This is important because operations between tensors stored in different memory spaces can be inefficient, requiring data to be moved between the CPU and GPU memory, and can result in slower execution times.

Having different tensor types for different storage locations allows for more efficient use of memory and processing power, as well as easier manipulation of tensors on different devices.

13> so in other words we get an explicit point where we can convert from TensorCPU to TensorCUDA, and a user who calls this api will understand the performance cost

Yes, that's correct. The explicit point of conversion allows the user to understand and control the performance cost of transferring data between different storage locations. It also allows for easier integration with other libraries that may have different storage requirements.

14> are there other reasons?

Yes, another reason for having different tensor types is to allow for more efficient implementation of specific operations on different hardware. For example, some operations may be more efficient to compute on a CPU, while others may be more efficient to compute on a GPU. By having different tensor types, we can write specialized implementations of these operations for each type that are optimized for the underlying hardware. This can result in significant performance improvements.

15> are there typically different access patterns?

Yes, there can be different access patterns for CPU and GPU tensors due to the underlying hardware architecture. For example, GPUs are optimized for parallel computation and can handle massive amounts of parallelism, whereas CPUs are optimized for single-threaded performance and can handle smaller amounts of parallelism. Therefore, it may be more efficient to perform certain operations on the CPU or the GPU depending on the access pattern and workload. Additionally, the way data is transferred between CPU and GPU can also affect performance, and using the appropriate tensor type can help optimize this process.

16> could you show me some examples of typical access patterns for both varieties?

Sure, here are some examples:

TensorCPU access patterns

  • Sequential access: Reading the elements of a tensor in row-major order (i.e., accessing elements in order of increasing row index and then increasing column index).

  • Random access: Reading elements of a tensor in a non-sequential order (i.e., accessing elements in an order that is not related to their index values).

  • Vectorized access: Reading a contiguous block of elements from a tensor using SIMD instructions.

TensorCUDA access patterns

  • Coalesced access: Reading contiguous blocks of elements from a tensor that are aligned with memory transactions on the GPU. This minimizes the number of memory transactions and increases memory bandwidth utilization.

  • Strided access: Reading non-contiguous blocks of elements from a tensor. This can happen when using certain CUDA libraries or when performing certain operations on tensors with non-contiguous strides.

  • Pinned memory access: Reading and writing tensors stored in host memory that has been pinned to allow faster transfers between host and device.

These are just a few examples, and there can be many other access patterns depending on the specific use case and the operations being performed on the tensor.

17> thanks, could you show me some others?

Sure, here are a few other examples of access patterns:

  • Random Access: This access pattern is characterized by randomly accessing different elements of the tensor with no predictable order. An example use case might be image classification, where each pixel of an image corresponds to a different element of a tensor.

  • Sequential Access: This access pattern is characterized by accessing the elements of a tensor sequentially in order. An example use case might be audio processing, where each sample in an audio signal corresponds to a different element of a tensor.

  • Stride Access: This access pattern is characterized by accessing the elements of a tensor using a non-contiguous set of indices. An example use case might be natural language processing, where each word in a sentence corresponds to a different element of a tensor, but the words are not necessarily contiguous.

  • Block Access: This access pattern is characterized by accessing the elements of a tensor in large contiguous blocks. An example use case might be matrix multiplication, where each element of the result tensor is computed by taking the dot product of a row from the first tensor and a column from the second tensor.

These are just a few examples, and there are many other access patterns that might be relevant depending on the specific use case.

18> do simd instructions apply to gpu architectures? or are there other instructions involved?

SIMD (Single Instruction Multiple Data) instructions are primarily used for CPU architectures and are executed by CPU cores. SIMD instructions are not directly applicable to GPU architectures, which typically have hundreds or thousands of cores working in parallel to process massive amounts of data simultaneously. GPUs have their own set of specialized instructions, such as those used for parallel processing and matrix operations. These instructions are optimized for the GPU architecture and can provide significant speedups for certain types of computations. Additionally, some GPUs may support SIMD instructions for specific operations, such as packing or unpacking data, but the SIMD implementation for GPUs is different from that of CPUs.

19> what are these gpu instructions called?

GPU instructions are often referred to as shader instructions or compute shader instructions. They are designed specifically for massively parallel operations on GPUs and are different from SIMD instructions used on CPUs. The instruction set architecture for GPUs is typically different from that of CPUs, with more emphasis on floating-point operations and support for parallelism.

20> could you go into more detail?

Sure! GPUs use a variety of specialized instructions and architectures that are optimized for parallel processing of large amounts of data.

One of the most important instruction sets used in modern GPUs is called CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture), which is developed by NVIDIA. CUDA provides a high-level programming model for parallel computing on NVIDIA GPUs, and includes a specialized set of instructions and memory hierarchy that is optimized for parallel processing.

Another important GPU instruction set is called OpenCL (Open Computing Language), which is a vendor-neutral standard for programming parallel computing devices such as GPUs, CPUs, and FPGAs. OpenCL includes a set of optimized math and vector instructions that are designed to take advantage of the parallel processing power of GPUs.

There are also other GPU instruction sets, such as AMD's ROCm (Radeon Open Compute) and Intel's OneAPI, which are designed to optimize the use of GPUs and other accelerators for high-performance computing tasks.


~368K SLoC