2 stable releases
Uses old Rust 2015
1.1.0 | Dec 4, 2022 |
---|---|
1.0.2 |
|
#47 in #unwrap
10KB
78 lines
auto_unwrap
Have you every written a function and were too lazy to have it return Result<T, E>
but still wanted to use the ?
operator? I present to you:
use auto_unwrap::auto_unwrap;
#[auto_unwrap]
fn fn_1() -> i32 {
let s = "does it detect this question mark? (no)";
println!("{}", s);
let x: Result<i32, ()> = Ok(23);
return x?; // gets replaced with x.unwrap();
}
assert_eq!(fn_1(), 23);
Is there someplace you would like to keep the ?
?
use auto_unwrap::auto_unwrap;
#[auto_unwrap]
fn fn_2() {
#[skip_auto_unwrap] // skips until (and including) the next brace-delimited group or semicolon
let closure = || -> Result<u32, f32> {
let ok: Result<u32, f32> = Ok(1);
assert_eq!(ok?, ok.unwrap());
let err: Result<u32, f32> = Err(2.0);
assert_eq!(err?, err.unwrap()); // without the skip this would panic!
Ok(2)
};
assert_eq!(closure(), Err(2.0));
}
this is updated from some previous code i wrote: yauc
I made this for one specific use case: Bevy systems. With all the queries you have to do there can be a lot of .unwrap()
's necessary, and that gets annoying.
Probably better practice to use .except()
but eh. And I made this mostly to learn how to do procedural macros anyway.
Dependencies
~1.5MB
~37K SLoC