This review is from Crev, a distributed system for code reviews. To add your review, set up cargo-crev.

2.0.2 (current) Rating: Positive Thoroughness: High Understanding: Medium

by kaiserkarel on 2022-01-17

Misses explanations on the use of unsafe. No backdoors and little potential. No dependencies.

Coverage is lacking, no proptests nor fuzzing.


These reviews are from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet and submit your URL to its registry.

2.0.2 (current) safe-to-run

From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of salsa.debian.org.

Packaged for Debian (stable). Changelog:

  • Team upload.
  • Package tiny-keccak 2.0.2 from crates.io using debcargo 2.4.4-alpha.0

[ Sylvestre Ledru ]

  • Package tiny-keccak 2.0.2 from crates.io using debcargo 2.4.3

cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.

unknown

May have been packaged automatically without a review

safe-to-run

This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…


Lib.rs has been able to verify that all files in the crate's tarball, except Cargo.lock, are in the crate's repository. Please note that this check is still in beta, and absence of this confirmation does not mean that the files don't match.

Crates in the crates.io registry are tarball snapshots uploaded by crates' publishers. The registry is not using crates' git repositories, so there is a possibility that published crates have a misleading repository URL, or contain different code from the code in the repository.

To review the actual code of the crate, it's best to use cargo crev open tiny-keccak. Alternatively, you can download the tarball of tiny-keccak v2.0.2 or view the source online.